Campus cuts: Where did the money go?

This past month, the University of St. Francis (USF) announced the termination of 18 staff positions as part of a broader academic reorganization. This move followed the installation of Ryan C. Hendrickson as the university’s 10th president. According to a statement quoted in the Joliet Patch, Hendrickson said the restructuring was “designed to strengthen the institution for the future” and emphasized the university’s “impressive legacy”. 

The layoffs have raised concerns among students and educators, particularly considering the timing and extent of the cuts. The university has not provided specific details regarding which departments were affected or how the adjustments may affect academic programs. Despite public concerns about possible financial misconduct by former USF President Arvid C. Johnson, no formal charges or investigations have been filed, and the university has not addressed the topic publicly. 

The university's formal retirement announcement for Johnson made no mention of compensation or controversy, simply stating that Johnson would step down after 12 years of service.

The university has also chosen not to engage directly with media questions about the

recent changes. According to the Joliet Patch, Vice President of Advancement, Lisa Sampalis, notified the outlet that President Hendrickson would not be making himself available for an interview. Sampalis said, “At this time, USF will decline the invitation for an interview. However, additional information about the academic reorganization can be found at www.stfrancis.edu/saints-united.” 

This refusal to comment has added to concerns about transparency, especially as questions linger regarding the university’s financial decisions and leadership history.

Some members of the university community have expressed frustration with the lack of

transparency. As stated in the past issue of the USF Encounter, “USF’s Financial Problem is not just a local problem”, Mars Angulo explains how both students and staff have expressed worry about budget cuts and the need for stronger enrollment methods, but there is little public recognition of the leadership flaws that may have contributed to the current financial strain. 

President Hendrickson has emphasized that his focus is on repairing trust and stabilizing the university's finances. However, the administration's decision to remain silent on previous leadership controversies raises concerns about accountability. Many believe that the university's future depends not only on reconstructing, but also on its ability to address the past.